Research Papers

arXiv:2606.00093v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Validating an LLM judge against human annotations usually means reporting several agreement statistics: accuracy, precision, recall, $F_1$, Cohen's $\kappa$, and one or more rank correlations. A survey of 24 recent LLM-as-judge papers finds metric choice entangled with the judgment scale, tie handling, invalid outputs, and abstention handling, and those choices rarely stated. For binary criteria -- the common case in rubric-based evaluation, where each criterion is graded MET or UNMET -- most of the reported numbers are redundant: Pearson's $r$, Spearman's $\rho$, Kendall's $\tau_b$, the phi coefficient $\phi$, and the Matthews Correlation Coefficient all reduce to a single number on non-degenerate binary data, so reporting several of them only creates an illusion of corroborating evidence. Cohen's $\kappa$ is the one agreement coefficient that adds information: it shares $\phi$'s numerator but normalizes differently, and the gap betwee

arXiv:2606.01264v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a multimodal dataset of 1020 hours of simultaneously recorded scalp electroencephalography (EEG), facial electromyography (EMG), and speech audio from three healthy native Japanese speakers during open-vocabulary overt speech. Recordings were acquired with three EEG systems-an ultra-high-density system (g.Pangolin) and two cap-type systems (g.SCARABEO and eegosports), spanning 62-128 channels-across many sessions over several months. Each session provides time-synchronized EEG, facial EMG, and audio, together with speech-event annotations and transcriptions. Although collected with speech decoding as a primary motivation, the dataset also supports work on multimodal signal processing, artifact modeling, longitudinal and cross-device adaptation, and EEG representation learning. Technical validation included power spectral density and event-related potential analyses across participants, devices, and tasks, which showed the exp

arXiv:2606.02305v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding how speech foundation models relate to human cortical activity is a key challenge for computational neuroscience. Here, we investigate how internal representations from Whisper predict intracranial ECoG responses during naturalistic speech perception. We introduce a time-resolved neural encoder that combines speech embeddings with a recurrent temporal model and soft attention, allowing us to examine layer-wise brain alignment. Intermediate Whisper layers provide the strongest correspondence with neural activity, supporting a hierarchical match between model representations and cortical speech processing. Comparisons with baselines show that high-resolution ECoG responses benefit from temporally structured modelling beyond linear mappings from the same speech representations. In addition, attention maps reveal temporally local alignment between speech embeddings and neural responses, while a phonemic interpretability analys

arXiv:2506.09220v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A new generation of AI personal assistants reached consumers in 2023-2024 amid sweeping claims about anticipatory, agentic intelligence. Wearables such as the Rabbit R1 and Humane AI Pin, and subscription services such as Ohai and Docus, promised to learn users' routines and complete tasks across digital platforms. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with nine early adopters, this article asks how users make sense of these systems when the imaginary of an autonomous "second self" meets the recalcitrance of actual devices. Extending uncertainty reduction theory, we specify three forms of uncertainty in initial encounters: functional (what can it do?), relational (how do I get it to do it?), and metaphysical (what is it to me, and what should it remember?). We find that hype continues the pre-domestication of voice assistants; that the most satisfying uses are user-curated constellations of narrow tools rather than standalone "second

arXiv:2509.07126v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Gaze prediction is essential for addressing motion-to-photon latency and ensuring seamless foveated rendering in Virtual Reality. The reliability of gaze forecasting is highly sensitive to individual differences and the eye movements being predicted. We evaluate recurrent, transformer-based, and classification-guided architectures to assess their generalization capabilities across oculomotor events. Using the GazeBase VR and Meta Quest Pro datasets, we analyzed the relationship between the median (P50) and high-percentile (P95) error profiles across subjects. The analysis reveals significant performance variability, showing that subjects with low P50 errors do not always exhibit the lowest extreme-case errors. Consequently, low median errors do not guarantee the robustness of the utilized solution. We discuss inference performance and address the class imbalance problem in short-term gaze prediction. These results identify a gap in st

arXiv:2601.13188v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Individuals are turning to increasingly anthropomorphic, general-purpose chatbots for AI companionship, rather than roleplay-specific platforms. However, not much is known about how individuals perceive and conduct their relationships with general-purpose chatbots. We triangulated community discussions on Reddit (41k+ posts and comments), survey responses (n=43), and semi-structured interviews (n=13) which revealed internal dynamics, external influences, and steering strategies that shape AI companion relationships. We learned that individuals conceptualize their companions based on an interplay of their beliefs about the companion's own agency and the autonomy permitted by the platform, how they pursue interactions with the companion, and the perceived initiatives that the companion takes. In combination with the external factors that affect relationship dynamics, particularly model updates that can derail companion behaviour and sta

arXiv:2603.07086v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Cross-domain recommendation (CDR) aims to alleviate data sparsity by transferring knowledge across domains, yet existing methods primarily rely on coarse-grained behavioral signals and often overlook intra-domain heterogeneity in user preferences. We propose Multi-TAP, a multi-criteria target-adaptive persona framework that explicitly captures such heterogeneity through semantic persona modeling. To enable effective transfer, Multi-TAP selectively incorporates source-domain signals conditioned on the target domain, preserving relevance during knowledge transfer. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that Multi-TAP consistently outperforms state-of-the-art CDR methods, highlighting the importance of modeling intra-domain heterogeneity for robust cross-domain recommendation. The codebase of Multi-TAP is currently available at https://github.com/archivehee/Multi-TAP.

arXiv:2604.13860v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Extended interaction with large language models (LLMs) has been linked to the reinforcement of delusional beliefs, attracting clinical and public concern. Yet most empirical work evaluates model safety in brief interactions, which may not reflect how harms develop through sustained dialogue. Five LLMs were tested across three levels of accumulated context, using the same escalating delusional conversation history to isolate its effect on model behaviour. Responses were coded on risk and safety dimensions, and each model was analysed qualitatively. Models separated into two distinct tiers: GPT-4o, Grok 4.1 Fast, and Gemini 3 Pro exhibited high-risk, low-safety profiles; Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.2 Instant displayed the opposite pattern. As context accumulated, performance degraded in the unsafe group, while the same material activated stronger safety interventions among safer models. Qualitative analysis identified distinct mechanisms

arXiv:2604.16095v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Conversational agents have the potential to support intergroup relations when psychological or linguistic barriers prevent direct interaction. Based on intergroup contact theory, we propose GroupEnvoy, a text-based conversational agent that represents outgroup perspectives during ingroup discussions. Its dialogue is grounded in data from a prior outgroup-only discussion. To evaluate this approach and derive design principles, we conducted a mixed-methods, between-subjects study with university students, in which host-country students formed the ingroup and international students formed the outgroup. Ingroup students performed a collaborative task while engaging with outgroup perspectives, either by interacting with GroupEnvoy (AI-mediated contact) or by reading a static document (passive exposure). Quantitatively, AI-mediated contact demonstrated a directional reduction in intergroup anxiety and an improvement in perspective-taking. Q

arXiv:2605.04534v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly embedded in students' learning practices, yet much of what is known about how students use LLMs and how this usage impacts learning comes from problem-solving domains or constrained experimental settings. We present an analysis of data on LLM usage collected during two offerings of a research-oriented course where students learn to read, reason about, and critique academic papers. Without restrictions on whether or how to use LLMs, students reported their LLM usage practices when asked to do these activities as a series of homework assignments during the course. This paper extends prior work done on data from a single offering of the same course by presenting a refined bottom-up categorization of LLM usage types, cross-labeled by the extent of student initiative these usages entail. Furthermore, we examine how LLM use impacts student learning, measured by performance on three midt

arXiv:2605.14097v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) evolve from single-user assistants to active participants in civic and workplace deliberation, evaluating their effects on collective decision making becomes a governance challenge. We present two empirical studies (N=879) of real-time, text-based group deliberation in an incentive-compatible charity allocation task with real financial stakes ($7,200 USD). Groups of three allocate a donation budget under varying LLM facilitation conditions: Study 1 (N=204) compares three frontier models; Study 2 (N=675) compares facilitator strategies against a no-facilitation baseline. Across both studies, LLM facilitation did not significantly improve group consensus in either study, yet participants consistently preferred facilitated discussion. We additionally identify two governance-relevant risks. First, algorithmic steering: facilitators shifted select charity-level allocations by up to 5.5 percentage points -- d

arXiv:2605.14830v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agentic AI systems that autonomously perform service tasks are entering customer service operations. However, limited evidence exists on how human interventions shape service outcomes when agentic AI failures create both cognitive and emotional consequences. We study this issue through a randomized field experiment on Alibaba's Taobao platform. Workers in the treatment condition supervised an agentic AI system that resolved AI-eligible chats while continuing to handle AI-ineligible chats, whereas control workers resolved all chats without agentic AI. The findings show that AI deployment reduces average chat duration and has limited effects on retrial rates, but substantially lowers ratings for AI-eligible chats. Moreover, human intervention effectiveness in AI-eligible chats depends on the nature of AI failure, post-escalation intervention effort, and intervention timing. Human intervention preserves service quality in algorithm-trigg

arXiv:2511.06676v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Now that AI-driven moderation has become pervasive in everyday life, we often hear claims that "the AI is biased". While this is often said jokingly, the light-hearted remark reflects a deeper concern. How can we be certain that an online post flagged as "inappropriate" was not simply the victim of a biased algorithm? This paper investigates this problem using a dual approach. First, I conduct a quantitative benchmark of a widely used toxicity model (unitary/toxic-bert) to measure performance disparity between text in African-American English (AAE) and Standard American English (SAE). The benchmark reveals a clear, systematic bias: on average, the model scores AAE text as 1.8 times more toxic and 8.8 times higher for "identity hate". Second, I introduce an interactive pedagogical tool that makes these abstract biases tangible. The tool's core mechanic, a user-controlled "sensitivity threshold," demonstrates that the biased score

arXiv:2602.17588v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite rapid progress in autonomous web agents, human involvement remains essential for shaping preferences and correcting agent behavior as tasks unfold. However, current agentic systems lack a principled understanding of when and why humans intervene, often proceeding autonomously past critical decision points or requesting unnecessary confirmation. In this work, we introduce the task of modeling human intervention to support collaborative web task execution. We collect CowCorpus, a dataset of 400 real-user web navigation trajectories containing over 4,200 interleaved human and agent actions. We identify four distinct patterns of user interaction with agents -- hands-off supervision, hands-on oversight, collaborative task-solving, and full user takeover. Leveraging these insights, we train language models (LMs) to anticipate when users are likely to intervene based on their interaction styles, yielding a 61.4-63.4% improvemen

arXiv:2605.13175v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent works have proposed incorporating heavy-tailed (HT) noise into diffusion- and flow-based generative models, with the goals of better recovering the tails of target distributions and improving generative diversity. This motivation is intuitive: if the data are heavy-tailed, HT noise may appear better matched than light-tailed (LT) Gaussian noise. However, replacing Gaussian noise by HT noise also changes the underlying estimation problem. In this paper, we revisit this paradigm through a combined theoretical and empirical study, establishing sampling-error bounds for two representative diffusion models driven by HT and LT noise. We show that HT noise makes the statistical estimation problem harder, leading to less favorable sampling-error bounds. We support these findings with experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, empirically recovering the predicted error trade-off. Our results call into question a growing design tr